May 14th, 2011 at 9:27PM
DnD Players Weigh In: Do Warlord’s Suck? Col. Soup Pot felt like a real fucking straight up towns person last gaming session instead of a hero. My only kill was with a crossbow I bought in town as a joke that I used on a dying kobold. Also, I made one kobold surrender but that was ridiculous. So do warlord’s suck? Does your party HAVE to have a healer/leader?

DnD Players Weigh In: Do Warlord’s Suck?

Col. Soup Pot felt like a real fucking straight up towns person last gaming session instead of a hero. My only kill was with a crossbow I bought in town as a joke that I used on a dying kobold. Also, I made one kobold surrender but that was ridiculous. So do warlord’s suck? Does your party HAVE to have a healer/leader?

  1. literaryfirearms answered: They’re good at what they do. If you’re not for a character that works the whole party rather than individual success, it may not be for you.
  2. arcaneasylum reblogged this from dorksplosion and added:
    Yes, your party NEEDS...healer/leader, and no better for
  3. sweetdreamsrest answered: Fuck no, I love playing a Warlord, and since my party is still grabbing at the idea of D&D and I know what I’m doing, a martial leader helps!
  4. dorksplosion posted this
5 notes #Dungeons and Dragons#4th edition#warlord#suck#rpg#dorksplosion#gaming
Short URL for this post: http://tmblr.co/Z7We1y57s6kE
blog comments powered by Disqus